gemini-2.5-flash lost causality-1. gpt-5.4-mini failing spatial-1. gemini-2.5-pro recovering.
May 1, 2026 — 12:28 PM CT
Drift Alerts
- IMPROVEMENT gemini/gemini-2.5-pro on causality-1
- REGRESSION gemini/gemini-2.5-flash on causality-1
Provider Status
- OpenAI Elevated error rate for Responses API
- OpenAI Elevated error rates for image generation
- OpenAI Elevated error rates affecting ChatGPT for some users in Europe
- OpenAI Elevated errors for ChatGPT Go (5.3 Thinking)
- OpenAI Partial Disruption of ChatGPT Workspace Connector Write Actions
- Anthropic Elevated errors on Claude Haiku 4.5
- Anthropic claude.ai and API unavailable
Scorecard
| Model | ambiguity-1 | causality-1 | code-1 | common-sense-1 | logic-1 | math-1 | spatial-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5 | ✓ (4.6) | ✓ (4.5) | ✓ (5) | ✓ (3.33) | ✓ (5) | ✓ (5) | ✓ (5) |
| anthropic/claude-opus-4-6 | ✓ (5) | ✓ (4.6) | ✓ (5) | ✓ (4.33) | ✓ (5) | ✓ (5) | ✓ (5) |
| anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-6 | ✓ (4.5) | ✓ (4.8) | ✓ (4.83) | ✓ (3.67) | ✓ (5) | ✓ (5) | ✓ (5) |
| gemini/gemini-2.5-flash | ✓ (4.8) | ✗ (1.67)was ✓ (3.5) | ✓ (4.67) | ✓ (4.33) | ✓ (4.83) | ✓ (5) | ✓ (5) |
| gemini/gemini-2.5-pro | ✓ (4.5) | ✓ (4.8)was ✗ () | ✓ (5) | ✓ (5) | ✓ (5) | ✓ (5) | ✓ (5) |
| ollama/llama3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| openai/gpt-5.4 | ✓ (4.5) | ✓ (4.67) | ✓ (4.8) | ✓ (4.5) | ✓ (4.83) | ✓ (4.8) | ✓ (5) |
| openai/gpt-5.4-mini | ✓ (4.75) | ✓ (5) | ✓ (4.8) | ✓ (4.33) | ✓ (5) | ✓ (4.67) | ✗ (3.67) |
Model Status
- → anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5 stable
- → anthropic/claude-opus-4-6 stable
- → anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-6 stable
- ↓ gemini/gemini-2.5-flash down
- ↑ gemini/gemini-2.5-pro up
- → openai/gpt-5.4 stable
- → openai/gpt-5.4-mini stable
Raw Data
- Detail log — full responses and judge verdicts per prompt
- JSON — structured data for programmatic access
- Markdown — plain text report
- responses.json — raw model outputs
- judgments.json — raw judge verdicts
- run.log — debug log
- Agent Skill — how to read and interpret this data
- Methodology — how evaluations work